Arguments Against Euthanasia Essay

1962 words - 8 pages

Global Analysis
Out of the three anti-euthanasia articles that I have thus far analyzed, two share a similar pattern. Both the American Medical Association's “Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia” and William F. May's “Rising to the Occasion of Our Death” utilize values as objects of agreement, or grounds of a proposed policy (value judgements). According to Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca’s “Facts, Values, and Hierarchies” piece, objects of agreements serve the premises and focus on finding common ground – or “what is supposed to be accepted by the hearers [to get the] agreement of the audience” (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 65). Since euthanasia is an ethical subject, value-based arguments are abundant in terms of policy arguments.
Both May and the AMA appeal to the morality of their audiences in order to convince them to act against active euthanasia, defined by May as “mercy killings” and by the AMA as the “administration of a lethal agent by another person to a patient for the purpose of relieving the patient’s intolerable and incurable suffering” ("Opinion 2.21 – Euthanasia."). More specifically, they are appealing to the value of what is “good” for the individual suffering, for their loved ones, and for society.
Their appeals to values are not simply opinions, however; this appeal can actually be treated as a fact or a truth. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca qualify that in order for a value to be taken as a truth or fact, it must be universally acknowledged, and in order for it to be universally acknowledged, it must be vague. “It is by virtue of their being vague,” these authors proclaim, “that these values appear as universal values and lay claim to a status similar to that of facts” (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 76). Nevertheless, there are essentially four main criteria to quantify if an argument uses values as objects of agreement:
Values are preferable.
Values are arguable to particular audiences.
Values are typically argued in hierarchies.
Values promote action. (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 65-76)
If a value is preferable, it is connected with a specific viewpoint. It is also only arguable to a particular audience (the actual audience addressed) instead of a universal one (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 66). Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca declare that “the existence of values, as to particular ways of acting, is connected with the idea of multiplicity of groups” (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 66). They further go on to claim that “one appeals to values in order to induce the hearer to make certain choices rather than others and, most of all, to justify those choices so that they may be accepted and approved by others” (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 75). This is an example of a value hierarchy, where some “values are adhered to with different degrees of intensity, but the audience admits principles by which the values can be graded” (Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca 80). Often, the hierarchies permit the values to be independent of each...

Find Another Essay On Arguments Against Euthanasia

Euthanasia: Murder or Mercy? Essay

1640 words - 7 pages feelings. Constant arguments between the two opposing parties have caused what seems to be an irreparable rift in the law system. These unbalanced opinions make euthanasia appear as much less appealing than at first glance. The third point is probably the biggest issue with euthanasia as a whole. Euthanasia goes against many moral and religious beliefs. One of the biggest issues when concerned with religion is the quality and sanctity of ones life

Euthanasia: We Have the Right to Die

1056 words - 4 pages ; the only difference was that Smith murdered the child, while Jones did not try to rescue the child. In the end, the result was acquiring the inheritance and the child’s death. In euthanasia, there is no difference between action and omission. Pro-Euthanasia Argument Euthanasia can be a positive or negative action depending on your point of view. Pro-euthanasia arguments argue that euthanasia can be the end of suffering for terminally ill patients

The Final Door

1606 words - 6 pages classifications of euthanasia exist, some legal in certain places, while others not. People opposed to euthanasia use several arguments against it, such as religious beliefs and the history of Nazis using it, while supporters reason with views in favor of it. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide both contain a strong element of questionable medical ethics subject to the criticisms of society, although many people support them regardless. The


775 words - 3 pages involve a cessation of treatment. The cessation of treatment most of the time is uncontrolled and done without the patient's permission. On the other hand Dutch system of voluntary euthanasia makes a slippery slope argument. The Dutch law for euthanasia is that patients have to ask for euthanasia, and they have to be suffering an intolerable pain. But only one third of all requests for euthanasia are honored by physicians, which is proof against

Legalizing Voluntary Euthanasia

1038 words - 4 pages reasonable to believe that there are many conditions in which voluntary euthanasia should be allowed, and there are many organizations that support the choice of voluntary euthanasia. So why is it that so many do not support the choice of the way a person wants to live or die? There are many common arguments people have against voluntary euthanasia. One argument against voluntary euthanasia is that “the old, disabled and incurably ill would

Should euthanasia be decriminalised?

1013 words - 4 pages essay will account for the arguments concerning whether to decriminalise euthanasia.Religious opponents oppose euthanasia because they believe that the right to decide when a person dies belongs to God. The basis of the Christian standpoint against euthanasia is that of the sixth commandment "Thou shalt not kill". Christianity teaches that suffering can have a place in God's plan, in that it allows the sufferer to share in Christ's agony and his

The Legalization of Euthanasia

1914 words - 8 pages Euthanasia legalization has been a controversial topic for years; studies have shown that arguments regarding the euthanasia debate are often depending on the process used to take the life of the patient. There are a lot of thoughts surrounding the issue of euthanasia and whether or not it should be legal. According to the Encyclopedia of American Law, euthanasia is categorized as a class of criminal homicide (, par. 3). However, not

Reserach Paper

1812 words - 8 pages focused on the desire for control over the timing and way of death. Equally, warnings about the possible abuse or harm of superseding societies established exclusions against assisting suicide or directly causing another person's death. Concurrent with this public dispute, but in many ways disconnect from it and has been the discussion of assisted suicide and euthanasia in the medical and ethical works. In this discussion, some assert that both

Euthanasia Should Be Legal and Inexpensive

1164 words - 5 pages people would see the other side of the arguments they have against euthanasia. One argument people have against legalizing euthanasia is often referred to as the ‘slippery slope’ of euthanasia. The ‘slippery slope’ argument explains how voluntary euthanasia could possibly lead straight to involuntary euthanasia, when the patient is able to consent but does not (Arguments). The transition from voluntary euthanasia to involuntary would be so


3859 words - 16 pages ethics, considering the arguments for and against upon euthanasia issue. However, the author further provides the facts, own thoughts and considerations to let the reader know what exactly proves euthanasia’s existence and why the author goes with it. The concept and methods of euthanasia Events of the past years only emphasize the urgency of the euthanasia problem. In early 2005 debates around the death of American Terri Schiavo heated in the

The Practice of Euthanasia

1212 words - 5 pages decisions. Problems with depression and psychological problems also make it impossible to make life ending decisions. I personally believe that the time that we are given here on Earth is given to use as a gift from God and should not be tampered with. Requesting someone else to commit an act that is illegal is also unethical and the individual could find themselves in trouble. Every moment that we are blessed with here on Earth, is just that, a blessing. Although the arguments for and against euthanasia are strong and persuasive, I do not agree with euthanasia. So we are back to that never ending, life changing question: Do you think the right to die should be granted?

Similar Essays

Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay

2001 words - 8 pages expedite the dying process. This paper is going to explore how euthanasia is viewed from religious and ethical points. Arguments for and against euthanasia will be presented using published research articles. In the United States, euthanasia is illegal in all states except in the states of Oregon, Washington, and Montana. In 1998 the issue of euthanasia was triggered in America when Dr Jack Kevorkian, a pathologist from Michigan showed

Euthanasia A Controversial And Of Risky Practice

1728 words - 7 pages Should euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide be legal? (1998): n.pag. Web. 22 Nov 2013. . Gish, Faye. "Patient Suffering at End-Of-Life." Euthanasia(2001): n.pag. Web. 24 Nov

Euthanasia A Controversial Topic Essay

1025 words - 5 pages could be viewed as assisted murder in a court of law. Three High Court judges ruled against euthanasia in 2012 and cited their reason as “voluntary euthanasia is murder, however understandable the motives may be” (“'Torture' over as British man Tony Nicklinson gets dying wish”). Many physicians do not want the act of assisted murder on their conscious (“Euthanasia” 229-230). The act of Euthanasia brings on a plethora of legal and ethical issues

The Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

1640 words - 7 pages controversy, so much so that it has been legalized in a few countries and remains illegal in the majority. What all the different types of Euthanasia have in common is that they are all relevant to today's modern society. The research questions that will be answered are as followed: What are the different type of euthanasia? What are arguments against euthanasia? What are reasons for euthanasia? What are the causes for euthanasia? And, what effects does
Do Not Fight | MagaThePanda | 10 x Ink Original Strong Snus - Chewing Bags Kautabak 1 x Stange Tabak