The Best Argument against Gay marriage: Glen Lavy’s
“Gay marriage and the ‘slippery slope’ ”
Proponents to the legalization of same sex marriage came up with a lot of reasons as why gay marriage should be legal. The major ones are that not allowing same sex people to get married prevents them from getting legal benefits like hospital visitation, health insurance, family leave and more. They also argued that they are fighting for their rights the same way African Americans were fighting back in the day, and that gay marriage will not threaten our society. For centuries, religious and political leaders had protected the sanctity of marriage as the union of a person with a member of the opposite sex for procreation in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law. Harvard law school graduate Glen Lavy, in his argument in the Los Angeles Times uses many great logical arguments showing that allowing gay marriage can put our society in a “slippery slope” situation. A situation where people involved in incestuous and polygamist relationship will want to be married.
As a senior counsel of a legal alliance of Christian attorneys the Alliance Defense Fund, Lavy could have argued his point in the religious way. He could have argued that the bible forbid same sex relationship also called sodomy, and that people who are involved or support it will burn in the eternal flames. Instead he appealed to the moral perspective of the society. In the beginning of his argument, Lavy strongly and logically asked, “With the California Supreme court’s eradication of the opposite-sex requirement for marriage, what is to prevent a future court from changing things like the binary nature of marriage or the prohibition on incestuous marriage?”
First, let’s talk about the first part of Lavy’s question which is marrying more than one partner. He explains how polygamist might use the legal blueprint of the lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and Transsexuals to legalize polygamy marriage In his argument Lavy asked, “How can a person say that his or her desire for a same-sex partner is more valid than a bisexual’s or polygamist’s desire for two or more partners?” He made his point by talking about a bisexual man or vice versa, who might want to have a wife and a husband since he was born that way and that is his right. As most people know these are the main defenses of the LGBT community in their fight for the right to get married. There is no biological proof or genetic marker that shows that someone was born to be attracted to the same sex or the opposite sex. By that logic, a bisexual and a polygamist can make the same case. People against polygamy argued that the women involved in them are being abused, and that polygamy marriage will be a tax problem. Women and men are also being abuse in heterosexual marriages. Since the law prosecutes the abusers in these marriages, it is logical to assume that the law will be able to prosecute them in polygamous ones also. I was...